Lufthansa Delays Decision On Brussels

Lufthansa Delays Decision On Brussels

Lufthansa’s Executive Board was set to give their recommendation today on whether or not the Supervisory Board should vote to acquire the remaining stake of Brussels Airlines that LH does not already own.    Over the last few weeks, momentum had been growing that the deal would be announced in April, but not we’ll need to wait til September at the very soonest to see what is decided.  Currently, LH owns a 45% stake in the airline and has until 2017 to exercise its option to buy the remaining 55% from SN Airholding.

The reason given for this delay is to allow Brussels, and Belgium at large to recover after the recent bombings at the airport and metro stations.   On the surface, it looks like a valid reason but in my opinion I think there may be other reasons that go beyond sympathy.

Since announcing the potential buy up of SN, Lufthansa has made it no secret that it is looking for other partners as it tries to boost its Eurowings LCC (Low Cost Carrier) division.   In addition to the SN deal, which still seems most likely, LH has approached SAS as well as Thomas Cook’s ‘Condor’ to see if there is any desire from these airlines to join Lufthansa Group.     Lufthansa has simply said that exploratory conversations had taken place but no decisions had been made.

In my opinion, I don’t think LH tapped the brakes on the SN deal because of the terrorist attacks.   As tragic as the events were, it was not a direct strike on Brussels Airlines and thus would have changed the tenor of the deal with Lufthansa.   In addition, the SN deal was nothing new.   LH has obviously been aware all along what the timeline would be for the deal and since it is already a 45% stake holder, it would be a simple accounting transaction that would close the deal for the remaining 55%.

What I think is happening is that LH sees a very fragmented LCC market in Europe, with far too many players involved which leaves only a few successful LCC operators such as EasyJet and Ryanair.    LH sees opportunities to bolster its line up with potentially larger market players such as SAS or Condor as compared to SN and they simply are going through their due diligence to confirm they don’t miss a better opportunity elsewhere.   With the sovereign ownership group of SAS being motivated to sell the airline, and Thomas Cook wanting to get rid of Condor who is saddled with 800 million euro in debt, LH might be able to get a fantastic bargain and at the same time at something new to the group, while still maintaining the SN stake.

Ultimately however, I truly feel that LH will take the path of least resistance and bring the rest of Brussels Airlines into the fold.

Just my 2¢……

a close-up of a plane

Near Term Strike Threats Abate, Talks Resume

Near Term Strike Threats Abate, Talks Resume

The Cabin Crew Union (UFO) has made a conciliatory overture and has offered to return to the negotiating table with Lufthansa as the 2 sides continue to try and reach an agreement.

Previously, the Union walked away from mediation and threatened to strike almost immediately (last week).  However, their hawkish overtone has been put back in its cage and negotiations are set to resume tomorrow, 13 July.

With this development, it appears that the risk of strikes has all but been eliminated for the next 1 or 2 weeks.


a close-up of a plane

LUFTHANSA Agrees To New IATA Carry-On Sizing Concept

LUFTHANSA Agrees To New IATA Carry-On Sizing Concept

Earlier this week in Miami, IATA held its Annual General Meeting where member airlines gathered to discuss the industry at large.

As part of these sessions, a proposal has been adopted to redefine what the proper dimensions should be for a carry-on.    The result?  a new ‘preferred’ dimension for a carry-on piece of luggage of 21.5 x 13.5 x 7.5 inches.  According to my abacus, this will result in Carry-On trolleys becoming 20% smaller that what is currently in place.

In comparison, Lufthansa’s current carry-on policy allows for a 21.6 x 15.75 x 9 inch piece of luggage to be brought into the cabin of their aircraft.

DOES THIS MEAN THAT YOUR ‘PREVIOUSLY’ COMPLIANT CARRY-ON IS NO LONGER ALLOWED?

No.    The new guideline passed by IATA is not law but simply a direction and guideline going forward for airlines and luggage manufacturers.   The idea behind the new dimensions suggest that a slightly smaller carry-on will enable more passengers to bring their carry-ons aboard instead of being forced to ‘gate check’ them; especially on aircraft that seat 120 or more passengers.

However, the new guideline suggests that bags compliant with the new dimensions will be given priority as far as being allowed on board.   How will this be enforced?  I don’t know and I don’t think enforcement is likely or quite honestly, possible.

So before you start panicking that your $700 Rimowa is no longer welcomed aboard, fear not.   The new policy simply means that future generations of carry-on luggage may be a little bit smaller.   OK, a LOT smaller.    IATA has already gone as far as merchandising the new change by creating a ‘Cabin OK’ logo on luggage that meet the new measurement criteria.

Thus far seven airlines have signed on to the concept including Lufthansa, Emirates, Air China, Qatar, Avianca, Azul, Cathay Pacific and China Southern.  No US based carrier has agreed to the new policy as yet.


a blue background with white text