Recently, I posted a piece highlighting the fact that South African Airways has put in place a policy that bans the transport of any large or endangered Wildlife Hunting Trophies aboard their passenger or cargo airplanes.
In addition to SAA, Emirates has now created a policy that takes effect on May 15 that also provides for the ban of Large Trophy Game transport on its aircraft as well.
To this end, I want to bring your attention to Lufthansa’s position on the topic.
I contacted LH Cargo soon after the SAA news to confirm what Lufthansa’s position is on this very important topic. I’m glad to report that LH has policies similar to the aforementioned airlines in place. In fact I think the LH policies may go a bit beyond what SAA has in place. According to the internal memo from SAA it targets only specific animals (Rhino, Elephant, Lion, and Tiger):
This leads me to think that SAA will still allow the transport of other Game not specifically listed in their internal communications.
In an email exchange with my contacts at Lufthansa Cargo, I was able to gain confirmation that Lufthansa and Lufthansa Cargo do not engage in the transport of Large Trophy Animals or animals protected under CITES 1.
From LH Cargo:
“We definitely do not transport large game trophies and, of course, no trophies for any endangered species, complying with CITES 1 regulations”
Animals that ‘qualify’ under CITES 1 include Elephant, Rhino, Lion, Tiger, Cheetah, Leopard, Zebra, Giraffe and other large game. Based on my interpretation of CITES 1, it provides for a ban on the commercial export or import of Game that is endangered or can potentially be endangered by harvesting. It does not apply to Game that is not at risk, such as Impala, Kudu and other antelope or small game not listed as an at-risk species.
If I interpret the LH statement correctly, it appears that they go beyond what is just required by CITES and may in fact go beyond what SAA and Emirates have put into place since they suggest that they transport NO Large game, not just CITES 1 protected animals.
Personally, I would like to see airlines band together and create a standardized policy that addresses this very sensitive and important topic. If it one day becomes impossible to transport ANY Animal Trophy due to airline policies, we will have made major strides in reducing the amount of senseless murders that take place of defenseless animals.
If game hunters realize that they can’t bring home the carcass of what they senselessly slaughtered while on vacation, perhaps then the animals will have a fighting chance.
HUNTING HAS PROVEN TO BE GOOD IN AFRICA , GENERATE REVENUE TO LOCAL POPULATIONS AND REVENUE TO ORGANIZE ANTI POACHING , SO IS SENSLESS THIS BAN
KENYA HAS CLOSED HUNTING SINCE 1977 , RESULTS….VERY SMALL QUANTITY OF GAME.
SOUTH AFRICA IN 1970 HAS 300K HEAD OF ANIMALS , NOW 18 MILIONS…… 85% OF ANIMALS ARE INSIDE OF PRIVATE RESERVE WHICH ARE USED BY HUNTERS
we dont want to sent guest on your planes if you dont stop.
They’ve stopped….Read this.
What I want to know is how much financial assistance do these animal rights group spend to help the African countries eliminate poaching and sustain fair amount of species to create a balanced wildlife population!! It seems to me that most of the funds collected from donations to PETA, Humane Society, etc. go more to their organizations overhead expenses than actual monetary donation to these countries which desperately need money to pay for policing, research, conservation programs, public education, etc. so they do not have to rely on “hunting revenues” to effect their plans and enforce their wildlife regulations. A truly dedicated animal rights advocate, in my opinion, MUST also direct his/her energy to ensure that appropriate monetary help goes strictly to where it is much needed so the goal of actual animal welfare and conservation and propagation of species can be fully attained. Litigation and war of words drain the coffers and enriches only the lawyers and media.
Thanks for your insightful comment. I suspect that we would be shocked at the amount of money that gets ‘lost’ in the conservation effort. I’ve spoken to a few lodge owners and guides in South Africa and almost all of them suggest that the amount of Graft and Corruption that exists in most African governments is preventing many of these organizations from doing the work we want them to do. Sadly, the hunters and their millions of dollars they spend on ‘licenses’ outweigh those who are looking to protect the animal. These African governments and their corrupt politicians do not see nearly as much money line their pockets from conservation groups as they see from hunters and hunting lodges that grease their palms. We have to figure out how to cut off the head of the snake.
I agree completely with your comments:
“Personally, I would like to see airlines band together and create a standardized policy that addresses this very sensitive and important topic. If it one day becomes impossible to transport ANY Animal Trophy due to airline policies, we will have made major strides in reducing the amount of senseless murders that take place of defenseless animals.
If game hunters realize that they can’t bring home the carcass of what they senselessly slaughtered while on vacation, perhaps then the animals will have a fighting chance.”